
It's a sad loos that philosophy is no longer read for personal enjoyment, or, more particularly, for consolation. Marcus Aurelius’
Meditations (the title's literal literal translation is '
Notes to Himself') have been my own first experience of this. Reading modern philosophy is, largely, desolating. There is a lot about doom, and abandonment, and most of it takes a year's contextual study to even understand. Aurelius is different. Prior to him, I always found the Victorian love of ‘classical virtue’ odd. Classical writers are often not particularly virtuous. Few people now celebrate Cato. We hear rather more of Julius Caesar; the man who slept with Cato’s sister, and then announced it to the senate. The man who rode into Rome on a chariot adorned with a gigantic, carved wooden phallus. The man who killed a measurable percentage of his world’s population.
Which is sad. Not because Caesar is unworthy to be learnt of. Rather because it means that men like Marcus Aurelius are left behind, and are heard about only by history majors, and seen only as a minor character in
Gladiator. He was an emperor of Rome at the very height of its power, before the plagues, before it fell. And his notebooks, written while on the miserable shores of the Danube, fighting Germans that he did not want to fight, are wonderfully simple and honest. They are a collection of notes, just odd thoughts, on death, on atoms, and all the bittersweet advice that he could give himself after a long life at the top of the world.
They are a joy to read. I have written notes to myself, before. Largely they are complaints, little more than a record of my current worries, to express an emotion too private to be told a friend. Something in that line. If I were able, at my slightest whim, to have any man arrested that I chose, or ruined, chastised, anything, would I have written this to myself-
“Put from you the belief that ‘I have been wronged’ and with it will go the feeling. Reject your sense of injury, and the injury itself disappears.”
And would I admonish myself for wanting solitude? Or for wanting to retire; though I were still fighting, a dirty border fight, at sixty?
His writing may seem stilted and moralising, particularly at the start. But to read his notes, you have to remember who he was. Remember that he was writing in Greek, a second, ‘academic’ language. Remember, above all, that they were all written as proscriptions for himself- constant reminders to a man already struggling to be good, undeniably and touchingly so, in a position and at a time when it was by no means expected. I am sure he knew that his notes may have been published, after his death. It tends to happen if you are a Roman emperor, particularly an intelligent one. But I do not think that he ever wrote them to be so.
And it is sad, even after all these years, to read someone so noble- and much more strikingly, so deeply human and
normal- write this:
“Mislead yourself no longer; you will never read these notebooks again now, nor the annals of bygone Romans and Greeks, nor that choice selection of writings you have put by for your old age. Press on, then, to the finish; cast away vain hopes; and if you have any regard at all for self, see to your own security while you still may.”
Not all Emperors are able to write words that inspire empathy in those separated from them by two millenia. It is an experience worthwhile in itself to understand his feelings, to know that humans, fundamentally, can be the same after all this time. It is unfortunate that Aurelius'
Meditations are no longer read as a part of the canon.
Because they are often profound, beautiful, and full of consolation for those who are looking for it.